Comments on: Landlords Sue SF Over Plan To Increase Relocation Payments For Displaced Tenants

By: Nathan

Nathan — Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:23:00 +0000

I don’t think the entire system of ownership is right so you may not want to read any further. I understand that the Levin’s “want’ to have more space but there are other humans that are living in that space that would not be able to find another space in the city. That’s where it ends for me. we are all here living together and the idea that the Levins or any “owner” for that matter believe that its alright to force people out simply because they “want more space” is wrong. So yes make them pay for that horrid privilege of forcing fellow humans to seek shelter elsewhere.Small price to pay.

By: Victor Cachat

Victor Cachat — Sat, 16 Aug 2014 02:12:00 +0000

Wah!
Look at where your lefty politicians and their wacko ideas got you.
Housing was affordable before leftism took that area over.

By: Victor Cachat

Victor Cachat — Sat, 16 Aug 2014 02:10:00 +0000

You have no right to stay in someone else’s property when they want to end the contract.
None.
Your supposed “rights” only exist in the fevered minds of leftist politicians.
And they certainly don’t owe you a single dime when they say “bye bye!” (except for the security deposit).

By: Victor Cachat

Victor Cachat — Sat, 16 Aug 2014 02:08:00 +0000

So, you get penalized for charging low rents?
For allowing tenants to stay a long time?
Here’s a thought: Boost the rent every freaking chance you get and take every d*mn unit off the market as soon as someone voluntarily leaves.
In the end, there will be no rental units.

By: peternatural

peternatural — Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:50:00 +0000

How can the new law “flagrantly violate” property rights, when all it does is update the price of evicting a tenant? $15,000 is fine, but $25,000 is a flagrant violation of fundamental rights? WTF?

By: njudah

njudah — Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:01:00 +0000

There’s a lot of stupidity going around on all sides. The way to fix or change or repeal the Ellis Act is at the state level. Period. These kinds of weird laws make people feel good during Assembly races when people like Campos are running on the public dime and need “feel good” things to put on junk mail, but even if it passes the courts will likely toss it out.

That said , there are some really bad landlords inSF who do incredibly stupid shit that ruin it for honest ones, same with tenants. Personally I wish we could put all the asshat tenants and landlords together let them fight it out , hunger games style, and the rest of us can live in peace and sans bullshit.

By: Jake Stein

Jake Stein — Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:12:00 +0000

The landlord owns the building. The tenant agrees to pay rent and not own the building or take a financial interest in it. What part of that do you or Campos not get? The landlord has rights and the more people like Campos trample on those rights, the more landlords will rebel and vacate their properties or jack their rents up to the sky once vacated. You have no clue as to what it is to own rental property and the amount of money it takes to run it. With idiotic laws such as rent control and forcing landlords to comply with moving costs not only ruins the rental market, it decimates any future housing owned privately to where you have government housing and you know how scummy that becomes. That is where your leaders in SF are driving you. FYI, I also believe if Campos and others believe so strongly in these moving costs, let Campos put his money where his mouth is and pay up out of his own pocket and help these renters. You will see he doesn’t believe that strongly in it when it comes to his own financial well being.

By: Jake Stein

Jake Stein — Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:03:00 +0000

Why are your landlords scumbags if they are exercising their rights as a property owner? Sounds like a lot of jealously and envy of those that have, as usual so you want to see them punished and you have a socialist in the name of Campos to rally around. You are ” only slated to get $27,000″. Do you realize that if such an insanity in babying tenants in this way catches on you can kiss the rental market goodbye as no sane landlord will rent their residential property out anymore. Stupid left wingers and their backwards anti capitalistic ways, they actually cause the very problem and then try to solve it. It’s people like Campos that will drive rents into the stratosphere and cause rental housing shortages, not the contrary. LOL

By: Zephyros California

Zephyros California — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 23:55:00 +0000

Also… I should have made clear: the plaintiffs claim that they have to pay ONE person $118,000 is an absolute lie and virtually impossible. And yes I know first hand about this because my scumbag landlords are ATTEMPTING to Ellis Act me right now and I’ve been in contact with David Campos’ office when they were writing this law. The new law requires landlords to pay the difference between what you’re paying now and what your apartment will fetch if it’s vacant…. x24 (months). I’ve lived in my place for 19 years, I have a huge flat and the rent would almost triple if I moved out… and I’m only slated to get $27,000. If this one person is getting $118,000 that means the difference between what their unit would go for on the open market and what they’re paying now is $5,000. Unless this person lived in the unit for 60 years and pays $100 in rent, this amount is absolutely impossible. And of course they’d twist the truth and lie about it to try and win. Typical scumbags.

By: max6135

max6135 — Fri, 25 Jul 2014 23:18:00 +0000

Start working at home with Google: I make $62 /hr on internet . I has been without a job for nine months but last month my pay was $10500 just working on the laptop for a few hours.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.PAYRAP.com-=-=

LOGON THE SITE –>>>CLICK NEXT TAB FOR MORE DETAIL AND HELP